The so-called "democratic" forces, which pursued their own "justice and fairness," prevailed.

Joseon, the world's poorest, most vulnerable country, was destroyed. It is clear that the fall of Joseon was a country that could no longer gain any justification for the very reason that it was "the most impoverished, discriminatory, and fragile." Even if the country had ethnic legitimacy. Of course, Joseon has even placed its identity in the Han and the Chinese, so this country cannot be recognized in any way, and it is the largest figure for this country and its people that even such dismantlement was done by foreign countries, not by the power of its own people. It seems accurate to define Joseon and its people as puppet terrorists and their slaves.



The fundamental principle of "state/civilization" is "security and economy." In the East, it was called the "wealthy and strong army." In this regard, one of the things that many people misunderstand is that there is no distributive definition of 'equality', especially economic wealth. However, if what they call "distributive justice" means "uniformity" in a communist way, their criticism is just a pun.



Rich countries can never be achieved in the unfair/unequal structure of the so-called rich and poor, and even in such an unjust group, they have a large number of soldiers and are well armedThis is because it cannot be achieved. The definition here does not mean equality of indiscriminate uniformity. In fact, it is unfair and negative that members of a community live on the basis of indiscriminate equivalence (uniformity) because there are numerous people of different abilities and tastes living in a community, and at the same time there are various situational needs and crises. Social 'justice' or 'fair' is determined only by 'division of labor', 'skillfulness', and most essentially 'market'. In other words, 'justice and fairness' is paradoxically possible only in a reasonable and timely 'value discrimination'.



In Korea, the contradiction between "industrialization" and "democratization" has become widespread, a distortion of concepts that is more serious than even the fictional confrontation between "pre-wealth theory" and "common wealth theory" in the communist country. We must understand that the source of this distortion stems from Korea's denial of "industrialization" and China's bizarre system of "communist capitalism" all from its denial of "autonomous markets" and "value discrimination" based on it, and philosophically "humanism. The true aspect of the king crab's ideal is only greed and evil.

Early on, the "Yohwang" of "Yohwang," which is said to have been an ideal era in Chinese legend, defined the basis of politics as "sik," or "to let the people eat their fill without starving." In addition, Maengja, the representative of the Yuga family, also emphasized this, and said that once a person is full, he or she can know "yes." In this context, I think that Korean 'industrialization' and its orientation are consistent with the classical spirit of the East. And in this context, like modern China, it is absurd to seek "distributive justice" again after creating an extreme "rich, poor, poor" structure in which only certain forces monopolize all wealth.

In Korea, however, the so-called "democratic" forces, which have set "industrialization" and "democraticization" as confrontational structures for the past 20 years, defined "traitorous" and "redundant forces" pursuing "righteousness and fairness" only. However, at this point, it gradually became known that their true character was exactly the opposite of what they were talking about.

Under the guise of "straightening history," they eventually called Korea a disgraceful country that should not have been born, tried to deny and kill the market under the guise of "economic justice," put the Korean economy in the worst crisis, destroying the fairness of democracy, "three powers" system, and tearing apart "social justice." And it injected all kinds of evil ideas into the minds of men and women of all ages in Korea, making people no longer able to live normally and self-destruct. As a result, they have now come to reveal themselves as thoroughly "hating and destroying the Republic of Korea."



So now, 'democratization' is only 'evil' in Korea. This is because it denied its roots, namely 'security and economy', and instead devastated the souls of the people with all kinds of lies and incitements. Contrary to their propaganda, the Republic of Korea is the worst debt in history, wealth, education distortion, treason and corruption of rulers, maximum social conflict, complete alienation of the marginalized, widespread hatred and despair, eventually poverty, Taiwanese struggle, and self-destruction.



Only as long as "democratization" is deleted, Korean "industrialization," or "making a world of Hongik people who eat well and live well by working and cooperating with each other based on principles," is attempted again, and hope and glory will be possible again for this country and young and old.